Anope IRC Services

Anope Development => Feature Requests => Topic started by: Gianluca on August 22, 2011, 04:54:37 PM

Title: [Request] New ChanServ SET OPTIONS
Post by: Gianluca on August 22, 2011, 04:54:37 PM
Hi i have new idea for this Services..A new Oper Comand:

An restrict access (Help Op/SOP/SA/(Services Coder) and ROOT for same channels.

Syntass:
/cs LEVELS #canale Services-List

/cs LEVELS #services SA ( Access denied for Oper, HelpOp and SOP)
/cs LEVELS #prova ROOT ( Access dened for Oper,HOP, SOP and SA )

The cmodes +A or +O is too limited, for this command the access is too restrict and it is very utility :)
Title: Re: [Request] New ChanServ SET OPTIONS
Post by: katsklaw on August 22, 2011, 11:55:51 PM
1: /cs levels is already taken.
2: cmode A/O is an ircd thing.
3: Since services can not prevent users from joining channels, they can only react. Its best that the ircd handle it.
Title: Re: [Request] New ChanServ SET OPTIONS
Post by: Gianluca on August 25, 2011, 09:26:16 AM
yes is taken from no XOp list but here OLEVELS or OLEVEL...

If i want an channel when only Services Admin or Root can join the chmode +O or +A is not good.
every Server Admin or Oper can join this restrict channel...But white the /cs OLEVEL #canale SA only SA and ROOT can join this channel and not Server Admin..
Title: Re: [Request] New ChanServ SET OPTIONS
Post by: Jan Milants on August 25, 2011, 09:31:38 AM
Quote
Since services can not prevent users from joining channels, they can only react. Its best that the ircd handle it.

just ban *@* and add exceptions or invites for the opers you do want to allow in...

and since services can't prevent it, you might as well akick everyone else if you insist on using services... same result
Title: Re: [Request] New ChanServ SET OPTIONS
Post by: Gianluca on August 25, 2011, 12:32:25 PM
yes but an Services Oper or Services Admin can ovveride these restriction
Title: Re: [Request] New ChanServ SET OPTIONS
Post by: Jan Milants on August 25, 2011, 12:42:51 PM
so? if you can't trust your own opers, they shouldn't be oper to begin with..
your own staff behaviour should be directed by policy rather then by restrictions.. if they cannot follow policy rules, they don't deserve to be oper imho...
Title: Re: [Request] New ChanServ SET OPTIONS
Post by: katsklaw on August 25, 2011, 03:33:09 PM
so? if you can't trust your own opers, they shouldn't be oper to begin with..
your own staff behaviour should be directed by policy rather then by restrictions.. if they cannot follow policy rules, they don't deserve to be oper imho...

Second! Also, this is not just a few peoples opinion, but hasI been standard practice for many years.
Title: Re: [Request] New ChanServ SET OPTIONS
Post by: someone on December 08, 2011, 03:31:05 AM
Second!
finally a topic we are not having a diffrent opinion ^^