Anope IRC Services

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: IRCd Shell - which would be better  (Read 13103 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Andrey

  • Anope User
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 65
    • RedeNorte
IRCd Shell - which would be better
« on: October 20, 2008, 06:09:50 AM »
any help me choose good ircd company?

i used sh3lls.net, kire.net, gridstar.net, but all down in ddos attack ;/
Logged

TwinShadow

  • Anope User
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 64
    • ShadowHime
Re: IRCd Shell - which would be better
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2008, 06:52:47 AM »
I tried sh3lls.net for about.. 4 months before I switched off. This is only me, but they give me very high ping when I shouldn't for some reason on their servers, when I have virtually no ping on some other servers. Although, some people probably have better luck than I do perhaps. Currently, I have an account with The Host Busters and so far, they have been fairing better than Sh3lls from what I've seen.

[edit] Fixed a typo, which I'm just now noticing... ain't that sad?
« Last Edit: October 21, 2008, 08:14:14 PM by TwinShadow »
Logged

Charles Kingsley

  • Contributor
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1405
Re: IRCd Shell - which would be better
« Reply #2 on: October 20, 2008, 06:06:42 PM »
We have an account with sh3lls (anope.org/sponsors.php) and it's been fine apart from the hard disk failure the other week which was fixed very promptly.

Can't comment on the pings I'm afraid.
Logged

deiks

  • Anope User
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 139
  • Shizle my nizle
Re: IRCd Shell - which would be better
« Reply #3 on: October 20, 2008, 08:54:42 PM »
I'm using eXolia.fr
Logged

zEkE

  • Anope User
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 34
Re: IRCd Shell - which would be better
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2008, 07:26:06 PM »
I haven't noticed any problems with iSpeeds, a network I'm on has 4 IRCd's on 3 servers with bots on a 4th iSpeeds server, and no problems that wouldn't affect any other provider.
Logged

Amanda Folson

  • Anope User
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 164
  • O_O
    • ZomgIRC
Re: IRCd Shell - which would be better
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2008, 02:05:51 PM »
I'm partial to DarkStar (darkstarllc.com) one of my servers runs on one of their shells and there have literally been NO problems. It hasn't ever gone down for anything other than routine maintenance. Their customer service is also really good.
Logged

Andrew B.

  • o.O
  • Contributor
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 35
    • Keyboard-Failure
Re: IRCd Shell - which would be better
« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2008, 07:25:05 AM »
If you're going to fork out decent money for a shell, I suggest going with a VPS from linode.com. -- 20 bucks for a decent VPS, which is about the same cost of a 'decent' IRCd shell. Deployment is really easy.. and they allow IRCds on 3 of their 4 data centers.
Logged
Andrew Berquist,

irc.kbfail.net

Ircd_Lover

  • Guest
Re: IRCd Shell - which would be better
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2008, 09:46:55 PM »
guys  i know u think twice to buy one server or ircd account
but dont ferget only one to protect u from deanil of service is gige box

now gige box is getin a bit on problems but still 1 one

well depense how many kids com around your servers and use ddos agains u
but samtime if u have account in (earth) box and u dont have any one to ddos u
and if samone else have same account in this (earth) box  and he have problems with kids
u goin to have that problem to

so thats why is little bit complicated about to find the best isp to host your servers

anyway trust me guys use gige and u dont have that much problems like in another isp like shakrtech or stamnius etc


anyway i will give u some advise how to protect ircd from floodin some plans and  strategy to cut down from 100% floodin to 25 maby 30% of floodin on my next posts in general chat

for now i have to go have nice time guys


regard tony
Logged

Ircd_Lover

  • Guest
Re: IRCd Shell - which would be better
« Reply #8 on: October 31, 2008, 10:27:01 PM »
denial*  sorry i type some words wrong
Logged

deiks

  • Anope User
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 139
  • Shizle my nizle
Re: IRCd Shell - which would be better
« Reply #9 on: November 02, 2008, 07:10:40 PM »
Surely, Edit do it better ;)
Logged

Charles Kingsley

  • Contributor
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1405
Re: IRCd Shell - which would be better
« Reply #10 on: November 03, 2008, 05:24:13 PM »
[dx],

If you're not going to be constructive, don't post at all.

Logged

deiks

  • Anope User
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 139
  • Shizle my nizle
Re: IRCd Shell - which would be better
« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2008, 12:10:09 AM »
Ok chaz, sorry ;)

Just trying to pay attention to others
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »